Carbon dating of genesis seriøse dating sider Varde
Unwilling to challenge the data openly, they erased the report from public view without a word to the authors or even to the AOGS officers!Evolutionists generally feel secure even in the face of compelling creationist arguments today because of their utter confidence in the geological time scale.As the shelf of water spewed forth into the land and the land masses themselves collapsed into the void, the earth may have in essence, shrunk.This would have had the same effect as a spinning ice skater pulling in her limbs to accelerate her rotation.The challenge is that it operates under a set of assumptions.Any scientist with an open mind would tell you that if these assumptions were shifted towards a Biblical view, the carbon dating process would still work, though at a much shorter time scale.In other words, whether you assume that the planet is billions of years old or if you believe that the earth is thousands of years old, carbon dating still works in both situations.In several documented situations when carbon dating ran contrary to common scientific assumptions, the results were only an anomaly if the world were billions of years old.
This assumption allows for C in the environment is mostly constant.
These remarkable findings were presented by the German physicist Dr.
Thomas Seiler at a conference sponsored by the American Geophysical Union (AGU) and the Asia Oceania Geosciences Society (AOGS) in Singapore.
It also partially explains the various ages associated with fossils of creatures from before the flood.
The second component is the speeding of the earth’s rotation that may have happened as a result of the flood.
This is the biggest assumption that is challenged by many scientists today because C.